Battery management is becoming a more direct part of underground production planning as electric equipment moves into regular operation. Instead of treating the battery as a fixed component of a machine, operators increasingly need to account for how much usable energy is available, how the battery is performing and when the equipment can be recharged without interrupting production.
The Global Mining Guidelines Group (GMG) notes that charging and battery swapping can affect equipment availability and utilisation, making battery-related information relevant to the way electric fleets are operated. A Battery Management System (BMS) can monitor parameters such as State of Charge (SoC), State of Health (SoH), temperature and charging conditions, providing information that can help determine whether a machine is ready for its next task.
Several factors can influence a machine’s available operating window:
- State of Charge
- Battery health and degradation
- Route distance and gradient
- Payload and duty cycle
- Charging availability and duration
This makes battery management more closely connected to shift planning. A machine with sufficient charge for one route may not have enough usable energy for a longer or steeper assignment, while a machine approaching a charging window may need to be scheduled differently from one that can continue operating.

Battery condition and available energy are becoming operational inputs that can influence when underground electric equipment can work, charge and return to production.
Battery Availability Influencing Equipment Selection
The importance of battery management becomes clearer when several machines depend on the same operational energy resources. Underground fleets can experience different energy demands because equipment operates across different routes, payloads and gradients. This means battery availability cannot be assessed independently from the work assigned to each machine.
Research on underground battery-electric Load-Haul-Dump (LHD) operations has shown that battery availability and swapping resources can affect queueing and production when multiple machines require energy at similar times. The findings reinforce the need to consider battery resources alongside equipment requirements rather than treating energy replenishment as a separate activity.
As operators build more detailed information about battery condition and machine duty cycles, that data can also influence wider decisions around mine power infrastructure. The next consideration is how individual equipment requirements connect with the electrical systems needed to supply an expanding electric fleet.
Battery Management Becoming Part of Production Control
As electric equipment becomes more integrated into underground operations, battery management is moving closer to the centre of production planning. State of Charge (SoC), battery condition, charging availability and equipment duty cycles can influence when a machine is assigned to a task, when it needs energy and how long it can remain productive.
The main operational considerations include:
- Matching battery availability with production requirements
- Scheduling charging around equipment activity
- Tracking changes in battery condition
- Reducing unnecessary waiting for energy replenishment
- Maintaining equipment availability across the shift
This makes battery information increasingly relevant to the wider mine operating system. Rather than treating battery monitoring as a function limited to the equipment itself, operators can use it alongside fleet and production information to make more informed utilisation decisions.
References
- Recommended Practices for Battery Electric Vehicles in Underground Mining โ Version 3
- Developing a Model for Production in Underground Mines with BEVs
- Analysing Battery Swapping of Battery Electric LHD Machines in Block Cave Mining Using Discrete Event Simulation
- Epiroc CIM 2026 Presentation: Developing a Model for Production in Underground Mines with BEVs
























