Defence of West Virginia’s former ‘King of Coal’ rests without calling witnesses

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access the Media Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Related stories

Apple Invests $500mn in MP Materials to expand U.S. supply

In a recent move, technology giant Apple Invests $500mn...

Egypt and Saudi Arabia Exploring Mining Cooperation Options

The Egyptian minister of petroleum and mineral resources, Karem...

Steel Tariffs To Protect Domestic Steel Industry In Canada

Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada on July 16,...

New Mining Law in Egypt to Shift EMRA Into Economic Entity

A new amendment to the mineral resources law in...

Defence of West Virginia’s former ‘King of Coal’ rests without calling witnesses

The defence of ex-Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship, the man once known as West Virginia’s ‘King of Coal,’ and that now faces charges of conspiring to break mine safety laws at Upper Big Branch Mine, rested their case Monday without calling any witnesses in the high-profile trial.

The announcement by Blankenship’s lead attorney, Bill Taylor, came shortly after the prosecutors finished weeks of interrogations, AP reports.

Lawyers have been asserting claims that the former CEO put dollars ahead of human safety in the years before the deadly 2010 accident at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch mine in West Virginia, considered the worst U.S. coal mine disaster in four decades.

The prosecution contends that while publicly proclaiming safety to be his company’s number one priority, Blankenship repeatedly denied requests to equip his mines with necessary equipment and then lied to federal investigators about it.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), said the tragedy was the result of an accumulation of gas ignited by a spark that came off a piece of shearing equipment, which is used to cut through a long section of wall to get at the coal seam.

But according to the federal government, and to the state’s own independent investigation of the mine after the fact, “virtually everything that could have gone wrong in this situation did go wrong,” writes Tim Murphy, who recently profiled Blankenship in Mother Jones.

The Governor’s Independent Investigation Panel report backs Murphy up, as it says that the explosion was the result of failures of basic safety systems identified and codified to protect the lives of miners.

Blankenship, who insists he is innocent and the victim of government and media excesses, could face up to 30 years in prison.

The Upper Big Branch mine explosion killed 29 men.

Latest stories

Related stories

Apple Invests $500mn in MP Materials to expand U.S. supply

In a recent move, technology giant Apple Invests $500mn...

Egypt and Saudi Arabia Exploring Mining Cooperation Options

The Egyptian minister of petroleum and mineral resources, Karem...

Steel Tariffs To Protect Domestic Steel Industry In Canada

Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada on July 16,...

New Mining Law in Egypt to Shift EMRA Into Economic Entity

A new amendment to the mineral resources law in...

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

– Access the Media Pack Now

– Book a Conference Call

– Leave Message for Us to Get Back